The greens want to do right, but they are so wrong

An excellent example of how White hatred for Blacks manifests itself:

Stop bullying fat kids

An excellent example of how Whites exploit a non-existent problem to provide Themselves with a job-for-life living off those They hate – those They can label as pathological. And yet, such labelling is, itself, pathological. Interestingly, since Whites always need a scapegoat for Their own failings, and no longer feel They can be overtly racist, They’re busy finding other targets for their lack of self-respect - as a form of morbid compensation – that is, licensed bullying.

Witnesses see things differently at Mikey Powell trial

RESPONSE TO ABOVE ARTICLE:

The usual (police) suspects

You’d think that given that Police Officers are paid an above-average UK salary, that they could dress somewhat better than is evidenced by these photographs. But perhaps that would be asking for mutton to look good when dressed as lamb?

The Sweeter the Berry

RESPONSE TO ABOVE ARTICLE:

As if: ‘STAR OF the new X Men movie Halle Berry chats to Blink's Elsa O'Toole about spinning, flying, and how she'll always face discrimination no matter how many awards she gets’ isn’t bad enough! Just you wait for the next sentence. ‘The themes of the blockbuster are prejudice, alienation, and tolerance vis-à-vis individuals deemed different or “other” by society, posing the question “should they take a cure for mutancy?” - subject matter that brings the movie bang up to date for the world in 2006’.

Since when have the themes mentioned above NEVER been bang up-to-date? The writer really does believe there’s something new under the sun!

‘Halle Berry gave people of colour a proud glow of equality when she made history by becoming the first African American to win Best Actress for Monster’s Ball in 2001...’. I wonder if people of no colour would feel a proud glow of equality if Hugh Jackman won an Oscar for his acting. Equality with whom, exactly? Martians or Venusians?

And isn’t it this idiotic issue of equality that’s always the problem with Blacks: Equality as a goal rather than an opportunity. Such lack of ambition: Merely to be equal with Whites! Why not be better than Whites or is it that Blacks just can’t be better than the Racist Race? Or better than their cultural race-enemies? Or what about actually being the best? How about that? Are Blacks afraid of sticking-out too much in contrast to their racial coevals? And of thereby becoming more readily-recognisable as targets for the usual racial abuse based, for example, on the White Resentment that utters the political depravity that jobs must go to Whites first and the least intellectually demanding roles to Blacks?

The fact is that Blacks cannot refrain from sticking-out against the White Background because – the purchase of a non-distorting mirror will help here – You are Black and They are White. The difference is clear, no? Haven’t You noticed this or are Blacks trying desperately to conceal Their racial difference behind the illusionistic, trompe l'oeil façade of equality? I think we should be told!

Here is the real killer: ‘Berry: Well you know what? Everyday I wake up with this brown skin – I don’t care how much money I have, I don’t care how many movies I do, I don’t care how many awards I have on my shelf, every day I am still aware that I am a woman of colour, and there is still certain discrimination that goes along with that and that does not change. [Italics mine.]

‘No amount of money, or awards changes that; what changes discrimination is the consciousness of people, I do see that gradually changing, and I believe that one day, colour and race won’t matter’. [Italics mine.]

My italics sense an oxymoron here – or is it just in my italics? How can something never change yet be capable of change? I can only think of the minute hand on my study-wall clock which I know changes from minute-to-minute, but which I never actually see moving! All this nonsense from a woman I’d like to lick all over! My sexual fantasies will never be the same again.

Frank TALKER wonders if short people wake up feeling they’re going to be discriminated against because of their lack of stature or whether women feel this when working in a largely male work environment. Ms Berry can’t tell us anything more profound and differentiated from other forms of discrimination than the vacuous banality that her skin colour invokes discriminatory feelings in others. This beggars belief that any Black could believe that Ms Berry’s success is going to be of much help in potential Black-Role-Model terms.

The fact is that discrimination is universal. And if people choose to hate you for it - no matter what your worldly success - then you can’t whinge about the fact that your worldly success hasn’t brought about an end to such discrimination. Nothing ever will bring this about. You simply haven’t understood the universal nature of discrimination – fool!

It’s a curiously mistaken, materialistic delusion that somehow materialism can solve the problem of universal discrimination when it’s such materialism that underlies all racism. Racists are concerned with material threats to their alleged wellbeing. And all their cant about losing their cultural identity after an influx of Darkies comes down to nothing more than the fear that they will find it harder to find employment in changed racial circumstances. Or even worse, that they will have to actually ask a Black for a job! (Personally, I’d much rather chomp on my own snot – wouldn’t you?)

Ms Berry’s doing the White Racist’s job for Them because she’s fallen into the trap that Blacks will be respected if They play the White Racist’s game of chasing fame and fortune without also seeking self. This results in not seeing oneself as one really is; only as Whites see you. Hence, her skin obsession. It’s no coincidence that superficial people never live any more deeply than the level of their epidermises. Perhaps we should call them epidermoids?

Ms Berry admits this universalism: ‘Everybody can relate to the subject matter; everybody has felt like an outcast and always will on some level I think, whether you’re Black, White or pink’

Halle Berry is an affective slave to Whites because she doesn’t realise that racists can be beaten. Not by playing Their game, but by not playing Their game; that is, not considering it important that every time she wakes up it troubles her that her skin is brown. Only then will the day dawn that ‘one day, colour and race won’t matter’. Only when she accepts this, in herself, rather than absurdly focusing on the racism of others and, thereby blaming her own self-hatred on Them, will that day ever dawn.

Frank TALKER fears being burgled but He doesn’t blame His fear on anything intrinsic to who He is – He blames His fear on the fact that burglars actually do exist.

When Blacks stop racially-abusing Themselves in this way (saving the racists the effort of doing so) then 80% of the problem of racists in the world will be solved. It’ll never happen, of course.

Ms Berry is an idiot and not a little confused about whom she is. She is the perfect exemplar of precisely what’s wrong with Blacks all over the world whom live among a majority of Whites. They become obsessively and narcissistically skin-conscious to the extent that They believe all the White Propaganda about this being an indicator of genetic inferiority. And yet she claims: ‘I’m really comfortable with myself and the way I look’! Words fail me! But quotes don’t.

‘When I was a child, I felt that if only I could change myself my life would be better, as I’ve gotten older I’ve come to terms with what utter nonsense that is, and this movie adds light to that dark subject’. Really! Where’s the evidence in this interview for such a stunning metamorphosis when Ms Berry still spouts the same ‘nonsense’ she implicitly criticises?

The fact is that mixed race people are often confused about whom they are because they refuse to come-to-terms with the fact that Whites don’t tolerate them as half-white but as half-black. Whites regard their half-blackness as more important than their half-whiteness; hence the fact that Whites are just as racist towards those who’re mixed race as they are to full-blooded Negroids. This continues to prove that race is always uppermost in the White Mind – odd, given the very obvious fact that Halle Berry is peculiarly prodworthy (for a black, anyway!).

Those of mixed race need to accept that their confusion about whom they are springs from their silly decision to define themselves in terms of White Confusions about whom they are, rather than in terms of their personal achievements. Such people have a difficult time knowing whether they’re black or white – whether they’re coming or going; fish or foul; animal, vegetable or mineral? This points up the fact that no matter what Blacks achieve (Halle Berry is wealthy) they still consider Themselves inferior because of their dislike of the fact that They were born the “wrong” colour. It is better that Mixed race people consider themselves as Black – just to be on the safe side – because of the fact that White Racists are racist not toward Blacks but toward non-Whites. The White Response to people of mixed race proves this because even people with only a little bit of so-called racially intermixed blood will be seen as non-White rather than Black.

And isn’t a career in acting the usual response for such empty shells of people whose lights are on while nobody home?

I’ve always wanted to shag you, Halle, (I still do – only now not so hard). But I'm sorry, darling, it’ll have to be a one-night-stand since a meaningful relationship with a black/white; white/black person of no fixed identity just isn’t going to produce a long-lasting seeing-to. Your place or mine? (This explains her two failed marriages, the poor soul.)

Contrary to the interviewer's belief that modelling is an insubstantial profession, acting is even more so because it’s filled with insubstantial people.

But ask yourself, why is that?

RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE ARTICLE:

Frank TALKER often asks Himself: “Why can’t Blacks string a logical argument together?“ Here’s the answer.

‘POLITICIANS SAY don't give the BNP the oxygen of publicity, but can't stop talking about them. Rashid Julien wants the hypocracy (Sic) to stop’.

This is a non sequitur because the moment you claim anyone should be deprived of the “oxygen of publicity” is the very moment when you’ve publicised them! So saying that politicians ‘can’t stop talking about them’ is mere tautology because the only way to starve anyone of such publicity is never to mention them at all. And this is precisely what Whites want: Don’t mention the (White) Racists. This is the same as Basil Fawlty declaring: “Don’t mention the war” – it’s hardly surprising that few Germans want to be reminded of what their country did to the Jews. Similarly, Whites also don’t want to be reminded that their exists a White supremacist political party particularly as there is no Black Equivalent. This leaves Whites politically exposed as racists without any way out of the corner that Their racism always paints Them into.

The problem that Blacks have is that if They’re intent on starving White Racists of the oxygen of publicity They fall into the trap of censoring people just because They disagree with Them. They also reveal Their inability to engage in rational debate with racists in order to pull down their arguments one-by-one; piece-by-piece. Because the only way you’re ever going to defeat racists is to destroy the so-called rationale that underpins their racism: the unproven theory of racial difference. When Blacks express fear of racist publicity, They admit that They aren’t equal to this challenge which, itself, gives racists the oxygen of publicity because it very strongly implies that Blacks are intellectually inferior enough not to be able to engage in such argument.

The author continues, in his seminally stupid manner: ‘How could one man - so insignificant - get so much free publicity?’ This question proves a failure to understand the nature of publicity. Publicity isn’t democratic; it’s based upon what is believed by those creating it to be of interest to its readers. Because the UK is an institutionally racist country, White Newspapers are inevitably going to print pseudo-science backing-up the prejudices of Their readers – as well as those supporting Their own. It’s hard to understand how anyone living in this country for any length of time doesn’t fully appreciate how Whites think, speak and act – maybe the author doesn’t get out enough?

The reason politicians are focussing on the British National Party (BNP) at the moment is nothing to do with the ingrained racism of the electorate but the failure of White Politics to electrify the demos. White politicians need a distraction from the failure of politics to arrest the UK’s terminal economic decline; they also need someone to blame: the poor Whites who generally vote for the BNP.

The fact is that if something is popular, no amount of publicity deprivation can work. This was tried during prohibition in America but, since alcohol is a popular beverage it was doomed to failure from the outset. The fact is that racism will out no matter how little publicity it gets because it is such a popular point-of-view among Whites -–and becoming more popular as it becomes clearer still that Whites aren’t the superior race they crack Themselves up to be. After all, if They were, how do They – for example - explain the loss of Their British Empire to a bunch of inferior Darkies?

‘What had happened over the past few years was that the mainstream had shifted further and further to the right...not towards the righteousness, just toward the right. Scary’. This is near-gibberish. The mainstream has always been on the right in the UK – this is a fundamentally right-wing country. How else do you explain racist immigration controls, the British Empire, the war in Iraq, the War on Terror, a rigidly-inflexible class system, the BBC as a White Propaganda organisation, etc. These are not the characteristics of a meritocracy but of an aristocracy with a democratic façade.

To try and explain racism away with bromides like ‘fear and ignorance’ is really despicable. Fear of what, exactly? Racism isn’t fear of “otherness” – that is merely how it expresses itself – racism is never knowing who one is; it is a lack of self-respect and self-confidence; it is a lack of self that seeks valorisation through non-existent group identities. As one cannot think with another man’s mind nor eat with another man’s stomach, one cannot know whom one is through another man’s experience. Thus the self can only ever be an individual characteristic – not a collective one. This snobs of all kinds (racists, social snobs, misogynists, disablists, etc) prefer to forget in their headlong desire to run from the fact of their dependence upon others for self-gratification that they could never provide for themselves.

‘False Evidence Appearing Real, remember that’. This garbage falls into the same trap as the Quintessential White Expression ‘bogus asylum seekers’. What the fuck is “False Evidence”? Evidence either exists or it does not! An asylum seeker exists or he does not. Neither can be “false” nor “bogus” under any circumstances whatsoever. How on earth can one ‘remember that’ when the statement one is required to memorise is itself false?

More nose-pickings disguised as wisdom: ‘...this great nation of ours which has a history of being a place of refuge for oppressed peoples...’ Oh, really? And which nation would that be, pray? Yet another Black Man whose fallen victim to White Propaganda about the inherent nobility of the White Race.

‘But where does this leave people of colour? Well, very simply ,confused’. You said it, Black boy. You said it. You being the most confused of them all.

‘All over our green and pleasant land the worrying and suspicious minds have ratchted (Sic) up fever pitch, and we are powerless to do anything about it’. Eh? Come again? First this sanctimonious moron says that the way to defeat racism is ‘proper argument’; then he says this! Either racists can be tackled or They can’t – Frank TALKER really does wish you’d make up your mind!

‘But what is certain is the issue of “race” and the “other” muscled itself onto the very front of the grid. A case of politics at its most devious’. This is just the same kind of paranoia of which this idiot accuses White Racists. He’s obviously a close kin in his own mentality. White Racism is much subtler than this, for god’s sake – else how explain its longevity?

Here comes another meaningless coinage: The ‘threat of fear’. What is that when it’s at home? Nobody is ever frightened of being frightened – they’re either frightened or they’re confident. People can be frightened of an event happening or not happening, but no-one is really frightened of fear itself without an object for the fear to attach itself. Fear does not exist in a vacuum – only a White Racist Psychiatrist would have you believe so, in order to provide himself with a lifetime’s work among allegedly insane Blacks.

‘...[T]he police will be expected to step up their harassment of people of colour as part of securing the needs of the majority...’. an interesting point but what are these “needs”? I think we should be told, don’t you?

And finally, a classic Black misstatement of the true situation within which They find Themselves: ‘So, in conclusion, the racists in suits will have actually achieved their objectives, they will have gotten their way after all’. They already have. Blacks aren’t trying to turn back the tide of racism, They are already inundated in it and are simply trying to stay afloat. Get real, for God’s sake! It is this very Black Unreality that makes racism so effective against Blacks.