RESPONSE TO ABOVE ARTICLE:
‘Labour Party chairman Hazel Blears says the British National Party made gains in May's local elections because voters felt ignored by mainstream politicians’. Whites are amazing, aren’t They?
The real reason the British National Party (BNP) made such gains is because their voters are racist. It is as simple as that.
The increasing success of racist parties like the British National Party (BNP) is now increasingly frightening mainstream White Politicians. They know They will have to mimic racist policies even more than They currently do in order to get the votes that the mainstream parties are now haemorrhaging to presently-marginal political parties. This is the truth underlying the ‘major concern’ of which Ms Blears so dishonestly speaks.
Ms Blears elaborates upon her Escapist White Fantasising: ‘Extremist politics flourishes where mainstream politics leaves a vacuum’. The fact is that mainstream politics has always been a vacuum. The difference now is that there are many more Blacks than there used to be in the United Kingdom and this gives Whites the required set of scapegoats to blame Their endemic economic failures upon.
Consider: There are 1,500,000 foreign workers living in the UK now. This almost exactly matches the current unemployment rate of 1,400,000. In other words, these new migrants take-up-the-slack that the native population is unwilling to fill; thereby, ensuring that those unemployed remain unemployed since their services are now that much less likely to be required. (It also shows that immigrants tend to be harder working than the indigenous population because of their inherent desire to succeed. This is demonstrated by their uprooting themselves from their own native soil to live in the nationalistically-hostile environment of the UK.)
The vacuum at the heart of UK politics lies in the fact that no alleged social problems ever get solved. This is because politicians are actually powerless to change anything. They only talk about change to provide themselves with jobs-for-life – and the success of their careers is not measured in terms of achievement but in terms of verbal commitment to achievement. In other words, they are evaluated in terms of trying – not doing.
Neither poverty, economic decline, crime, racism, misogyny, etc have ever been successfully tackled. This has meant that politicians have had to create another alleged war – this time upon the terrorism that Whites Themselves have created – in order to galvanise the public into working towards a common goal. This is a vain attempt to resurrect the wartime spirit that supposedly defeated Hitler. (In truth, Hitler was a masochistic nihilist who ultimately defeated himself by over-reaching ambition for self-destruction. A wartime spirit among the British is just the way that Brits love to flatter Themselves: It has nothing to do with reality.) The problem with this is that it stokes the very racism (against Muslims, specifically) that the very same racist politicians now decry! Stupit iriots! This is the true meaning behind Ms Blears statement that ‘[a]ll parties must take the responsibility for this’. She tacitly recognises that Whites are to blame. Not only for the improved electoral showing of the BNP, but also the racist War on Terror and the profound inability of politicians to solve genuine political problems in a country still mourning the loss of its Empire. And crying over spilt milk, in this Characteristic White Way, proves that racism is the only way Whites can conceive of living in the world with the 75% of the world’s population whom are irretrievably Black.
Ms Blears reference to ‘estates’ proves her inane belief that only the lower classes are prone to racism. This clearly implies that she – and her kind - are not. This also proves that Whites still cling to Their economically indefensible and Pyrrhically-inflexible class system. (Indeed, any successfully-applied racist system is always a Pyrrhic victory for racists; compare with the Holocaust.)
‘The BNP could, however, be "turned back" and "driven out" through better organisation and by educating people about what the party stood for, she said’. This is errant nonsense: The BNP are an irrelevancy! The issue here is that the United Kingdom has lost its political way since 1945. This is reflected in the fact that UK politics is now a ‘vacuum’ into which nihilists - like racists, environmentalists, anti-globalists, etc – can pour their misanthropic poison. Note that all such groups are essentially anti-Man – as the morbidly-inclined and death-worshipping communists were before them.
‘Ms Blears also insisted most voters did not like what the BNP stood for, arguing that it was merely a refuge for protest votes’. White self-delusion, of course. Whites speak this kind of claptrap because They don’t want to face the quintessential racism of Their moribund Culture. How typical of a White like Ms Blears to deny the inherent racism of her own genetic coevals.
Ms Blears is correct here: ‘But crucially, we need to remove the conditions in which they can thrive’. It’s difficult to be wrong about this since it’s blindingly obvious. But her solution is pathetic – as one would expect from a White Politician.
Only a politician would self-servingly claim that ‘[w]e need to rebuild our local democratic institutions, so there can be no democratic vacuums’. Of course, since that provides more jobs for more feckless and otherwise unemployable politicians! What would you expect! It’s typical of Whites to claim that we need more of the poison that’s killing us in order to save us from being killed by poisonous White Politicians.
‘We need a lively community spirit on every street and estate’. We’ve always needed this but the anti-capitalist and anti-poor socialists have no policy for achieving it. ‘We need well-funded political parties’. Of course, to provide more political jobs for White Politicians! This political scum wants us to pay for their pensions while not doing a hand’s turn for it to benefit us! ‘We need mainstream candidates in every ward’. More jobs-for-the-boys!
‘Only where mainstream democratic politics fails, can fascism take hold’. It’s only when the economy fails that fascism takes hold so this simply isn’t true. (‘[M]ainstream’ here is a synonym for White since most people in the UK are Caucasian. Whites here are simply trying to puff Themselves up.) This means that the only solution to racists is capitalism and globalisation – which the socialists and their bottom-feeding apparatchiks are keen on hindering in order to achieve a White World Hegemony. Freedom costs, and only capitalism can bring it about because the more productive ability you have, the more political freedom you can produce. Poor men are rarely free, after all. This is why such calls to political action will always fail to tackle fascism effectively because they are designed to provoke the very fascism that timeserving politicians can use to aggrandise their positions and keep them in well-paid employment. Politicians are more to blame than anyone else for the parlous state of UK race-relations.
Thursday, 22 June 2006
Architects in uproar as candidate for president revealed as BNP member
RESPONSE TO ABOVE ARTICLE:
This is typical White Hogwash about the supposed monopoly the poorly-educated have regarding racism. whites who claim not to be racially snobbish are perfectly happy being socially snobbish in the implication here that only the poorly-educated can ever be racist. And that somehow well-educated whites have – by virtue of being well-educated – immunised themselves from being racist. Where is the evidence for this outside the diseased minds of well-educated racists?
This proves Whites don’t understand that racism isn’t so much a political philosophy as a mental illness. Whites aren’t prepared to admit that Whites are capable of being racially ill in this way even though They are prepared to claim that there’s such a thing as Black Psychosis. The latter of which enables well-educated White Psychiatrists to lock up harmless Blacks because of the racist views of the well-educated White Psychiatrists. This view is, itself, racist.
Pretentious, self-aggrandising White Racism is revealed here: ‘The lofty, quietly studious corridors of the Royal Institute of British Architects in Portland Place, London, may seem a million miles from the rightwing extremes of the British National party’. Why would any rational, man-of-the-world ever believe any of this nonsense? Why would any institute with a royal charter be somehow exempt from the stigma of racism? we are never told, but Frank TALKER knows.
In the end, it’s just that well-educated people are better at hiding their racism, that’s all there is to it!
Self-righteous sanctimony: ‘The news [that a White professional is a racist] has thrown the profession into uproar’. In reality, it’s the fact that Mr Phillips’ has not been able to conceal his racism that is the problem – not the fact that he is a racist. This is proven by: ‘I know him only too well and I have despised many of his views for a long time’. In which case, why have his views only now come to public light? This just goes to show how little concern Whites have for the problems caused for Them by the racists in Their midst (the enemy within), because They don’t believe Their own racist and racial complicity negatively affects Them. Worse still: ‘It is shocking that someone like him is in our midst’. So, why tolerate him in your midst?
‘No doubt he would not have received the 60 nominations necessary if those who nominated him knew of his political affiliations’. Really? Where’s the evidence for such a stupidly anti-racist assertion?
Look at how repetitively desperate Mr Phillips’ fellow Whites are to say they deplore his attitudes: ‘Absolute outrage has been expressed by everyone on council I have communicated with. No doubt that is a united feeling among the profession’. No doubt!
More hogwash about how sad Whites are that there’s a racist in their midst: ‘His views are totally countercultural to the profession, and absolutely antipathetical (Sic) to what the vast majority of our profession are interested in’. Where is the evidence for these statements? Why are there no more black architects than there are, for example?
This is typical White Hogwash about the supposed monopoly the poorly-educated have regarding racism. whites who claim not to be racially snobbish are perfectly happy being socially snobbish in the implication here that only the poorly-educated can ever be racist. And that somehow well-educated whites have – by virtue of being well-educated – immunised themselves from being racist. Where is the evidence for this outside the diseased minds of well-educated racists?
This proves Whites don’t understand that racism isn’t so much a political philosophy as a mental illness. Whites aren’t prepared to admit that Whites are capable of being racially ill in this way even though They are prepared to claim that there’s such a thing as Black Psychosis. The latter of which enables well-educated White Psychiatrists to lock up harmless Blacks because of the racist views of the well-educated White Psychiatrists. This view is, itself, racist.
Pretentious, self-aggrandising White Racism is revealed here: ‘The lofty, quietly studious corridors of the Royal Institute of British Architects in Portland Place, London, may seem a million miles from the rightwing extremes of the British National party’. Why would any rational, man-of-the-world ever believe any of this nonsense? Why would any institute with a royal charter be somehow exempt from the stigma of racism? we are never told, but Frank TALKER knows.
In the end, it’s just that well-educated people are better at hiding their racism, that’s all there is to it!
Self-righteous sanctimony: ‘The news [that a White professional is a racist] has thrown the profession into uproar’. In reality, it’s the fact that Mr Phillips’ has not been able to conceal his racism that is the problem – not the fact that he is a racist. This is proven by: ‘I know him only too well and I have despised many of his views for a long time’. In which case, why have his views only now come to public light? This just goes to show how little concern Whites have for the problems caused for Them by the racists in Their midst (the enemy within), because They don’t believe Their own racist and racial complicity negatively affects Them. Worse still: ‘It is shocking that someone like him is in our midst’. So, why tolerate him in your midst?
‘No doubt he would not have received the 60 nominations necessary if those who nominated him knew of his political affiliations’. Really? Where’s the evidence for such a stupidly anti-racist assertion?
Look at how repetitively desperate Mr Phillips’ fellow Whites are to say they deplore his attitudes: ‘Absolute outrage has been expressed by everyone on council I have communicated with. No doubt that is a united feeling among the profession’. No doubt!
More hogwash about how sad Whites are that there’s a racist in their midst: ‘His views are totally countercultural to the profession, and absolutely antipathetical (Sic) to what the vast majority of our profession are interested in’. Where is the evidence for these statements? Why are there no more black architects than there are, for example?
Tuesday, 20 June 2006
People get ready
RESPONSE TO ABOVE ARTICLE:
My scorn and contempt for this nonsense completely defeats me and I have better things to do anyways. Its basic problem is that it pretends that racism can be defeated even though it’s self-evident that the Second World War did not defeat fascism – only fascists. How soon they forget the lessons of recent history.
The worst aspect of this article is as follows: ‘PUSH, which stands for People Uniting to Save Humanity, has been a major force in US political life since 1971 fighting for social change’. This lie is then followed-up by proof that it’s a lie: ‘Mayor of New Orleans Ray Nagin used his keynote address to speak directly to the malaise affecting men of colour, who are at the bottom of the table for work and education opportunities’. If ‘men of colour’ lack the same work and educational opportunities as in 1971, then what – exactly - has PUSH been doing for the past 35 years?
Imagine a soccer team at the bottom of a league division working for three decades to reach the top but that had, after all that time, never left the bottom. You’d then be entitled to ask what they’d been doing in all that time, and to suggest that it was time for a change of management because the present team isn’t doing its job at all effectively.
My scorn and contempt for this nonsense completely defeats me and I have better things to do anyways. Its basic problem is that it pretends that racism can be defeated even though it’s self-evident that the Second World War did not defeat fascism – only fascists. How soon they forget the lessons of recent history.
The worst aspect of this article is as follows: ‘PUSH, which stands for People Uniting to Save Humanity, has been a major force in US political life since 1971 fighting for social change’. This lie is then followed-up by proof that it’s a lie: ‘Mayor of New Orleans Ray Nagin used his keynote address to speak directly to the malaise affecting men of colour, who are at the bottom of the table for work and education opportunities’. If ‘men of colour’ lack the same work and educational opportunities as in 1971, then what – exactly - has PUSH been doing for the past 35 years?
Imagine a soccer team at the bottom of a league division working for three decades to reach the top but that had, after all that time, never left the bottom. You’d then be entitled to ask what they’d been doing in all that time, and to suggest that it was time for a change of management because the present team isn’t doing its job at all effectively.
Monday, 12 June 2006
Rally for Justice
(2006)
RESPONSE TO ABOVE ARTICLE:
‘With the intensification of "terror raids" throughout the country and "trial-by-media" sensationalism, communities are under severe attack and must show unity’. There’s no need for ‘communities’ to show unity since ‘unity’ will have no impact on White Racism – and never has.
Calls for unity are a tacit admission that that unity does not exist; otherwise, why would there be any need for a call for a unity that already exists?
The reason unity does not exist in the Black Community is because Blacks spend most of Their valuable time trying to suck-up-to and appease White Racism. Blacks think They’ll obtain something, now, in this generation that They don’t have the patience and ability to wait and work for in the future. They care nothing for Their kids only for Their present needs. This Blacks call Equality in our Lifetime, which really means: “How Far Can We Get Our Tongues Up the White Man’s Arsehole – in Our Lifetime?”
The reason the police and the wider White Race want to try and terrorise Muslims and Muslim lookalikes is because They know that Muslims are not going to help Them in Their so-called War on Terror. Even if Muslims do help out here, Whites don’t believe that They really are being helpful only pretending to be so as a vain means of deflecting White Racism away from Themselves. This is, in fact, why any Muslim would help a white and proves Muslims haven’t learned any lessons about the mistrust in which Whites regard Them and the mistrust with which They should regard Whites.
The fact that Whites judge everyone by Their own standards only, This lack of trust of others proves Whites can’t be trusted because it demonstrates that White Culture is based upon mistrust. If it were not, why would Whites automatically assume others can’t be trusted? To the good, all things are good; to the bad, all things are bad. Not helping Whites is simply payback for decades of White Racism; while Whites trying to terrorise Muslims is payback for Muslims not accepting Their alleged inferior status with White Culture. At the end of the day, Whites know that if the racial situation were reversed in the UK, Whites wouldn’t help Muslims if Muslims were being terrorised by White Fundamentalists, such as the BNP. (Additionally, up until recently, Whites have refused to get involved with Muslim forced marriages; being imposed by Muslim fundamentalists. Now that Whites do get involved in it, They wish to use it – surprise, surprise – as a means of demonising and pathologising Muslim culture. Much moreso than simply saying forced marriage is wrong and that Muslims need protecting – an attitude Whites can’t manifest without scoring a racist point in the process. Strange that. But not so strange when you realise the essentially racist motivation beneath such a reversed viewpoint.)
The fact is that Blacks have never been united over any issue, as can be seen, for example, in the fact that afro-Caribbeans and Asians hate each other’s guts. There is also the issue that Asians tend to be the most racist people on earth. This accounts for the fact that the brown-skinned are so concerned to distance and differentiate Themselves from Muslims in order to avoid racial abuse that is currently being meted out to Muslims by Whites. Afro-Caribbeans are only too happy to be less likely to be racially-abused by the UK police since they are too dark to be al Quaeda.
Unity, what unity?
Additionally, the White Media are inveterately racist and are only too happy to exploit the White Racist myth that the darks-skinned are here in the UK to destroy White Civilisation – if, indeed, Whites can be called civilised, at all.
‘The heavy-handed tactics of the police are proving counterproductive. Instead of increasing security, high profile police "terror" raids have only spread more fear’. Heavy-handed tactics are always counterproductive so this statement is a tautology. The fear lies mostly in the hearts of those Whites who approve of such terror raids.
Formerly such raids were conducted discreetly but now, in order to show shit-scared Whites that Whites are being effectively protected from Blacks, the police are acting hand-in-glove with the media in a game of White racial public relations. This proves just how scared Whites are of the racist terrorism They have been instrumental in creating as They now rush around like headless chickens on the basis of uncorroborated tip-offs that turn out to be unreliable. It’s funny how Whites believe that leopards don’t change their spots, yet believe criminals when they offer Whites information that can be used for public-relations’ purposes. If such an informant denied in court that he’d committed a crime, he wouldn’t be believed because of his previous record, but if he claims some Muslims are terrorists he will be believed. The issue here is what the believer wishes to believe, not what the evidence indicates.
It should be pointed-out that the idea of a vest as a chemical weapon that the police allege they were searching for is a product of White Paranoia. Such a weapon would achieve little effect and certainly much less than an IED (Improvised Explosive Device).
That someone was shot during the raid shows that armed police officers chamber rounds in their cocked handguns while keeping their itchy trigger fingers on the trigger and not the trigger guard. In other words, the policy is not so much “shoot-to-kill” but “shoot first and ask questions afterwards”. This means that the police actually have no really effective and practical policy with regard to their use of firearms; meaning that Blacks can never, ever trust them. It’s foolish to say that trust between Muslims and the police has been destroyed since such trust never really existed in the first place because there never was any evidence nor proof of its existence.
The opportunity here is for Blacks to exploit the fact that Whites are so scared of dying that they would antagonise the only people who could ever help Them. Usama bin Laden can speak English; how many English speakers can speak Farsi? It’s obvious that Whites need Muslims to help Them understand what terrorists are planning; Muslims do not need Whites. Whites understand this so are resentful of the fact that They (the allegedly superior race) should have come to rely upon those They consider inferior. Even if a message is passed to the authorities by a Muslim that some foreign-language speaking person is planning some atrocity, Whites are so racist that They’d automatically assume that Their Muslim informant was a lying Raghead. This is why the police informant in this case was obviously a White Man since the UK police are far more likely to believe a member of Their own race rather than one of a despised race. Because Whites are going to racially abuse Muslims whether They agree to help Whites or no, it doesn’t matter what Muslims do to try and appease Whites. This means Muslims can do as They please. Think about it!
‘Despite the Government's boasts of a diversified society, the criminalisation of Muslim communities and rising Islamophobia are a direct result of Government policies’. It never ceases to amaze Frank TALKER that any Black would ever believe anything ever said by such an obviously institutionally-racist government as we’ve always had in the UK. These Fatuous Black Bastards have obviously forgotten all about the British Empire and the North-Atlantic Slave Trade and the centuries-old anti-Semitism endemic in British culture. Islamophobia is the direct result of two things. The resentment of Blacks because of the Whites loss of Their empire proving that Whites aren’t as superior as They claim to be. And the Muslims stupid desire to suck up to Whites in the vain hope of appeasing White Racism. It takes two to tango, remember. Muslims are simply evading Their part in the racism They choose to experience.
‘The anti-terror legislation is eroding all of our civil rights and the Government intends to extend police powers without the need for accountability’. These civil rights have only ever existed theoretically. Try to enforce your rights and you will find that Whites don’t agree that you’ve ever had them. The issue of ‘accountability’ is simply a formalisation of the lack of ‘accountability’ that has always existed regarding UK race-relations.
The only way to stop political terror is to stop being frightened of Whites. Believe me, Whites are more frightened of you than you could ever be of Them. Protests like this only prove to Whites just how frightened you people really are. You should stop being concerned with what Whites think about you. You already know as a result of incidents like this!
Six days to influence review into government race policies
‘What is at stake is a once-in-a-generation chance of shaping the legislative framework and organisational landscape on equality’.
Really? Problem is that equality is not a function of law and political institutions (theoretical constructs, all) but of the commitment to devoted labour and work of the individuals concerned – this is also true of inequality. To say otherwise is to admit that equality is impossible unless those who hate you allow you to be equal by passing laws to restrict their own racism. But why would such people allow or undertake any such thing given their belief that their inequitable practises provide them with an advantage? Since when has anyone sacrificed an advantage over another man – in all of human history – without demanding a countervailing sacrifice in return: Thus perpetuating the inequality complained of?
If race inequality actually exists, the sacrifice required of the unequal to remove such inequality has to be one-sided. This will never happen.
When Blacks complain of inequality, They admit that they are dependent upon Whites to achieve whatever Blacks do achieve in life, rather than upon Their own efforts. This proves the Black Inferiority that Blacks implicitly claim does not exist in their implication that inequality is inherently unfair. In such a case, there can be no good reason for Whites to stop being racist given that Blacks are thus tacitly admitting that They are, indeed, inferior.
So long as Blacks behave as inferiors, They offer Whites an excuse for Their racism. The fact is that you’re either equal (in terms of being just as human as anyone else) to others when you’re born or you ain’t. And if you’re not equal when you’re born then you won’t be equal even after you’re dead – it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.
‘This root-and-branch review could determine how effective, or otherwise, governments are in tackling inequality’. Because inequality (outside of deliberately racist laws) only exists in the minds of the unequal (ie, the objectively inferior), it is not governments who are best able to tackle inequality, but the psychiatric profession. There is also a refusal here to admit that the ‘governments’ being implicitly criticised here are White Governments’ since Caucasians have traditionally been egregiously racist.
There must come a time when Blacks stop whinging about White Racism. And then for Them to accept that there will always be racists and racism and that the only solution to such people and such practises is to get on with your life and succeed upon your own terms – not theirs. This will prove – apart from anything else – that Blacks are just as capable as Whites; while leaving Whites with no ammunition with which to berate Blacks. Whites will continue to be racist no matter what Blacks achieve, but will be ineffective so long as Blacks don’t practise Their dependence upon White Racists.
‘To get this wrong will mean that even if governments have the political will to aim for equality in our lifetime, they may not have the mechanisms to achieve it’. The ‘mechanisms’ to achieve equality exist firmly within the minds of individuals. This means not worrying about keeping-up-with-the-Joneses or comparing cock-sizes and then deliberately finding oneself deficient in some way because what he’s got is somehow bigger and better. It means accepting that human beings have different capabilities and that they are born, live and die unequal because of these fundamental, biological differences.
Blacks are here using equality as a euphemism for Marxist-Leninism. This means that equality can only be achieved when everyone is born in the same house, stays in the same house and dies in the same house as everyone else. Under such a system, all differences in character and temperament are to be abolished (ie, evaded) in order to protect the insecure, the feckless and the useless from a profound knowledge of their insecurities, their fecklessness and their uselessness. Such knowledge would upset them, after all, as it would force them to face their quintessential inferiority – and who wants to face that? This means athletics’ races starting from the same line; competitors running line abreast; and, then crossing the tape together – no winners and no losers! The least able would win medals while the most able would gain no advantage from being more able. Who, then, would compete in such a race since there would be no advantage to doing so since the very concepts of winning and losing would lose their all-important meaning?
There is no way to achieve this kind of so-called equality except with objective measurements. This means making everyone the same, but not equal. Frank TALKER doesn’t feel equal to an Einstein or a Shakespeare – he feels inferior. He doesn’t have a chip on His shoulder about this because he simply accepts – as all grown men must – that however clever He is, there’s always someone cleverer.
This definition of equality inevitably punishes the able as a sacrifice to the inferiority complexes of the less able. Such complexes become superiority complexes because self-styled victims always think they’re superior to those they look down their noses at (their actual superiors in ability). While such victims conclude that they’re not responsible for their alleged victim status - only that those who’re actually better than them are responsible for this. This is why state education produces mediocrities because it’s based upon such a dumbing-down of cultural and political life. It frustrates the clever while deluding the more dumb into thinking that they’re quite clever, after all. Such people usually become alleged artists and alleged politicians and alleged commercial entrepreneurs.
‘The issues go to the very heart of the campaign for race equality’. They don’t. They go to the very heart of the philosophy that proclaims: “The world owes me a living”.
‘There are many areas of public life where the realities of institutional racism are clear - anti-terror laws; asylum and immigration; citizenship; the criminal justice system, to name but a few’. While true, the fact is that Blacks do little to combat these injustices. Such as ensuring their children are educated to deal with White Racism more purposefully than merely whining about it. As well as setting good examples and being adequate role models for their offspring. Moreover, when Blacks complain about White Racism, They never also admit Their own culpability in the racism of which They tacitly approve. Approval based upon the fact that White Racism affords Blacks the opportunity to avoid the work necessary for successful living and demand racial alms from Whites through emotionally-blackmailing Whites for being racist.
‘Unless the government recognises racism - its causes and effects - it will never be able to get to grips with the challenge of making Britain an equal society’. As before, Blacks never explain why Whites would address such issues especially since Whites conceive that racism provides Them with a political benefit. And who ever renounces a benefit without demanding something in return? This proves just how unrealistic Blacks are.
‘We believe the Equalities Review has not analysed race properly and there are major flaws in its methodology’. This could just as easily be said of Blacks and the way in which They approach White Racism. A cultural match that will ensure racism remains at large – the only true equality ever possible between the races.
‘The Equalities Review is wrong to criticise campaigning and activism’. Of course, but that review was written by Whites who don’t want to be reminded that They condemn slavery but never condemn the British Empire – although both were based upon the evil of racism. Whites just don’t want Their dirty laundry washed in public – who does? This is why Whites ‘criticise campaigning and activism’.
There is no incentive for the middle-class to abolish poverty (since this would deprive them of a means of self-identification-in-comparison-to-the-poor – it would effectively abolish the lower-class & make the middle-class the new lower-class). So Blacks remain judged by Whites as inferior because then Whites would have no-one to feel superior to – the sole source of the White Superiority Complex.
Whites won’t renounce racism unless Blacks are prepared to give Whites something in return. Because racism is morally wrong, except in self-defence, it follows that Blacks needn’t offer anything in return for renouncing racism. Any more than a rape victim needs to offer a rapist anything in return for him giving up the practise of rape. Whites actually consider this implicit demand an actual quid pro quo rather than the emotional blackmail it really is!
In any case, even if Blacks did accept second-class citizenship status in exchange for abolishing the alleged need for anti-racism legislation from Whites, Whites still wouldn’t renounce racism. They’d carry it on in an increasingly covert manner.
Really? Problem is that equality is not a function of law and political institutions (theoretical constructs, all) but of the commitment to devoted labour and work of the individuals concerned – this is also true of inequality. To say otherwise is to admit that equality is impossible unless those who hate you allow you to be equal by passing laws to restrict their own racism. But why would such people allow or undertake any such thing given their belief that their inequitable practises provide them with an advantage? Since when has anyone sacrificed an advantage over another man – in all of human history – without demanding a countervailing sacrifice in return: Thus perpetuating the inequality complained of?
If race inequality actually exists, the sacrifice required of the unequal to remove such inequality has to be one-sided. This will never happen.
When Blacks complain of inequality, They admit that they are dependent upon Whites to achieve whatever Blacks do achieve in life, rather than upon Their own efforts. This proves the Black Inferiority that Blacks implicitly claim does not exist in their implication that inequality is inherently unfair. In such a case, there can be no good reason for Whites to stop being racist given that Blacks are thus tacitly admitting that They are, indeed, inferior.
So long as Blacks behave as inferiors, They offer Whites an excuse for Their racism. The fact is that you’re either equal (in terms of being just as human as anyone else) to others when you’re born or you ain’t. And if you’re not equal when you’re born then you won’t be equal even after you’re dead – it’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.
‘This root-and-branch review could determine how effective, or otherwise, governments are in tackling inequality’. Because inequality (outside of deliberately racist laws) only exists in the minds of the unequal (ie, the objectively inferior), it is not governments who are best able to tackle inequality, but the psychiatric profession. There is also a refusal here to admit that the ‘governments’ being implicitly criticised here are White Governments’ since Caucasians have traditionally been egregiously racist.
There must come a time when Blacks stop whinging about White Racism. And then for Them to accept that there will always be racists and racism and that the only solution to such people and such practises is to get on with your life and succeed upon your own terms – not theirs. This will prove – apart from anything else – that Blacks are just as capable as Whites; while leaving Whites with no ammunition with which to berate Blacks. Whites will continue to be racist no matter what Blacks achieve, but will be ineffective so long as Blacks don’t practise Their dependence upon White Racists.
‘To get this wrong will mean that even if governments have the political will to aim for equality in our lifetime, they may not have the mechanisms to achieve it’. The ‘mechanisms’ to achieve equality exist firmly within the minds of individuals. This means not worrying about keeping-up-with-the-Joneses or comparing cock-sizes and then deliberately finding oneself deficient in some way because what he’s got is somehow bigger and better. It means accepting that human beings have different capabilities and that they are born, live and die unequal because of these fundamental, biological differences.
Blacks are here using equality as a euphemism for Marxist-Leninism. This means that equality can only be achieved when everyone is born in the same house, stays in the same house and dies in the same house as everyone else. Under such a system, all differences in character and temperament are to be abolished (ie, evaded) in order to protect the insecure, the feckless and the useless from a profound knowledge of their insecurities, their fecklessness and their uselessness. Such knowledge would upset them, after all, as it would force them to face their quintessential inferiority – and who wants to face that? This means athletics’ races starting from the same line; competitors running line abreast; and, then crossing the tape together – no winners and no losers! The least able would win medals while the most able would gain no advantage from being more able. Who, then, would compete in such a race since there would be no advantage to doing so since the very concepts of winning and losing would lose their all-important meaning?
There is no way to achieve this kind of so-called equality except with objective measurements. This means making everyone the same, but not equal. Frank TALKER doesn’t feel equal to an Einstein or a Shakespeare – he feels inferior. He doesn’t have a chip on His shoulder about this because he simply accepts – as all grown men must – that however clever He is, there’s always someone cleverer.
This definition of equality inevitably punishes the able as a sacrifice to the inferiority complexes of the less able. Such complexes become superiority complexes because self-styled victims always think they’re superior to those they look down their noses at (their actual superiors in ability). While such victims conclude that they’re not responsible for their alleged victim status - only that those who’re actually better than them are responsible for this. This is why state education produces mediocrities because it’s based upon such a dumbing-down of cultural and political life. It frustrates the clever while deluding the more dumb into thinking that they’re quite clever, after all. Such people usually become alleged artists and alleged politicians and alleged commercial entrepreneurs.
‘The issues go to the very heart of the campaign for race equality’. They don’t. They go to the very heart of the philosophy that proclaims: “The world owes me a living”.
‘There are many areas of public life where the realities of institutional racism are clear - anti-terror laws; asylum and immigration; citizenship; the criminal justice system, to name but a few’. While true, the fact is that Blacks do little to combat these injustices. Such as ensuring their children are educated to deal with White Racism more purposefully than merely whining about it. As well as setting good examples and being adequate role models for their offspring. Moreover, when Blacks complain about White Racism, They never also admit Their own culpability in the racism of which They tacitly approve. Approval based upon the fact that White Racism affords Blacks the opportunity to avoid the work necessary for successful living and demand racial alms from Whites through emotionally-blackmailing Whites for being racist.
‘Unless the government recognises racism - its causes and effects - it will never be able to get to grips with the challenge of making Britain an equal society’. As before, Blacks never explain why Whites would address such issues especially since Whites conceive that racism provides Them with a political benefit. And who ever renounces a benefit without demanding something in return? This proves just how unrealistic Blacks are.
‘We believe the Equalities Review has not analysed race properly and there are major flaws in its methodology’. This could just as easily be said of Blacks and the way in which They approach White Racism. A cultural match that will ensure racism remains at large – the only true equality ever possible between the races.
‘The Equalities Review is wrong to criticise campaigning and activism’. Of course, but that review was written by Whites who don’t want to be reminded that They condemn slavery but never condemn the British Empire – although both were based upon the evil of racism. Whites just don’t want Their dirty laundry washed in public – who does? This is why Whites ‘criticise campaigning and activism’.
There is no incentive for the middle-class to abolish poverty (since this would deprive them of a means of self-identification-in-comparison-to-the-poor – it would effectively abolish the lower-class & make the middle-class the new lower-class). So Blacks remain judged by Whites as inferior because then Whites would have no-one to feel superior to – the sole source of the White Superiority Complex.
Whites won’t renounce racism unless Blacks are prepared to give Whites something in return. Because racism is morally wrong, except in self-defence, it follows that Blacks needn’t offer anything in return for renouncing racism. Any more than a rape victim needs to offer a rapist anything in return for him giving up the practise of rape. Whites actually consider this implicit demand an actual quid pro quo rather than the emotional blackmail it really is!
In any case, even if Blacks did accept second-class citizenship status in exchange for abolishing the alleged need for anti-racism legislation from Whites, Whites still wouldn’t renounce racism. They’d carry it on in an increasingly covert manner.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)