BBC still ‘hideously white’

(2008)

'Has the Beeb demonstrated that while its talk a good talk about equality events of late show that its not free of racist basis in its employment practices and its programme output. (Sic)' This has always been the case for race issues as it has always was – and always will be – for gender, sexuality and class issues. The BBC is a white propaganda organisation for the dissemination of lies about how wonderful White People are. It is an arm of government for precisely that purpose; establishing its fraudulent credentials by claiming to be objective, fair and impartial while never providing objective, fair and impartial definitions of these terms nor of what they mean by them. 'The objective was clear the BBC wanted to find evidence of corruption, fraud or anything else that could be used to discredit Lee Jasper former Senior Policy Director of the Mayor of London Ken Livingstone.' Obviously, when Whites are found fiscally corrupt, news of this is always downplayed in White Media outlets such as the BBC. Whites must teach a high profile pointer-out of White Racism like Lee Jasper a lesson because They are fed up with their negrophobia constantly being pointed out to Them because of the White Guilt it makes Them experience. Mr Jasper troubles the White Conscience and he must be destroyed in order to regain the racist balance required if Whites are to continue enjoying the unearned benefits of racial privilege in an institutionally racist country like the UK. 'The BBC London team used its vast resources on line (Sic) and radio combined with television to engineer a sense of manufactured crisis around Lee Jasper on (Sic) of the most senior black figures in the United Kingdom and its news reports sought to suggest impropriety and high corruption.' The more important issue is that whatever Whites want to talk about dominates the news agenda of supposedly objective news reporting. The very fact of talking about it is designed to create a "no smoke without fire" atmosphere in which Their fellow Whites will automatically and eventually assume that no matter the lack of evidence, there must be something to all this otherwise why would it be reported so extensively? Few Whites openly state that this is a self fulfilling agenda in which people are allegedly found guilty on the basis of nothing more than unprovable racist allegations – allegations repeated as allegations precisely because They cannot be proven. The most surprising thing here is that evidence against Lee Jasper has not been planted to put him on trial – but we may have that yet to come. This mirrors the fact that racism itself is an unprovable fallacy that Whites continue to believe simply because They wish to, not because They have found any evidence of actual Black inferiority. 'The BBC harassed anyone connected with Lee Jasper including the charity the 1990 Trust whom it recently accused, without a shred of evidence of failing to properly account for project funding received some five years ago.' More of the same racist muckspreading. The issue here is that racism is designed to create a one size fits all approach to racism in that all Blacks are tarred with the same brush if only one is found malfeasant. This is the collective punishment favoured by racists like Adolf Hitler and the present Israeli government. Whites are trying to provide Themselves with an age old justification for judging all Blacks by the worst examples of the race; all Whites by the best since when a White fucks up, it's claimed he's merely a rotten apple, not an exemplar of the entire contents of the barrel. 'The record of the BBC in employing black people in senior positions is a disgrace and the constant downgrading of black presenters within BBC London, their failure to invest in them and recognise their skills and expertise is evidence of the level of institutional racism at the Beeb.' The problem Whites have here is that They cannot allow Blacks to rise to senior positions precisely to protect White racist privileges. And to conceal from Blacks the fact that such privileges exist. The latter is impossible because racism only works in overt mode; making its presence self evident, as here: 'A climate of fear and intimidation has developed at the BBC and many staff feel deeply intimidated by the racism that has been unleashed by the BBC.' 'As on (Sic) young black man said recently "BBC in London is in real danger of being known as the British Broadcaster for Caucasians"'. This is naïve in the extreme since the BBC has always been this.

What will it take to end Child Poverty?

The problem here is that the reason for pretending to want to alleviate poverty is to increase the tax take, rather than altruism, and to cut social welfare costs. This is the hypocrisy caused by the fact that the welfare state has failed, and that there is to be no simple political admission of this for fear of losing votes from supporters. This is also an attempt to blackmail the affluent and the wealthy into paying the poor an increased proportion of their income in order to avoid their having to pay more in future, if they don't, from ever increasing social costs such as crime, visible poverty and even, perhaps, social revolution. However, these proposals never refer to the fact that most poor choose to be poor precisely because they can always rely on social engineers (ie, charitable mugs) to pay their bills for them. Charities and the poor are mutually corrupt because they're mutually dependent: The poor exploit charity to avoid work; the charitable exploit the poor to evade their own lovelessness. This is the true reason the poor have reduced employment prospects, not the unwillingness of governments to stump up the cash to keep the poor alive & kicking. No matter how much money you give to the poor, they will always want more, since such ethical corruption is always a bottomless pit into which the guilty (those who claim the poor are disadvantaged; ie, not as good as us, really) are always tempted to drop finite resources. You can always get a pint out of a quart pot, after all. The solution is to abolish social welfare altogether. The only way to empower others is to stop calling them disempowered by claiming they need your help because they're inferior. If true, then no attempt at empowerment can ever help anyone since that would be like claiming that a one legged man could grow a second leg and become an Olympic athlete. Such has never happened and never will. The idea that we could ever live in a share and share alike culture is naïve since it's obvious that we live in a dog eat dog; every man for himself one. Such a political change would require such a fundamental realignment of people's attitude to life that they would have to become the leopards that changed their spots. Can anyone suggest a historical epoch in which such a change has ever happened? No, of course not! The only way to end child poverty is to kill all the poor children, to take those poor children into care as a punishment for their parents not working hard to achieve productive goals or to sterilise the poor to reduce their birth-rates.

Recycled Communism & Nazism

(2008)

Here is the essence of White Culture laid bare with great brevity. Notice that Whites have always vigorously championed all of these political phenomena in Their instinctive desire to recreate the world in Their own image. Problem is that to do this, first the majority of the world's population must be defined as inferior so that they can be removed to make way for a world largely run by and for Whites; largely comprised of Whites.

You need friends in high places

Hereward: '…[I]n future regional public health bodies will (Sic) be told that international medical graduates shoul (Sic) be eligible for posts only if there was (Sic) no suitable graduate (Sic) from Britain.' 'Falling educational standards [in England] and a politically correct policy of employing third world people over local graduates.' The first paragraph above is racist nonsense by Whites that wish to maintain the unearned privileges of being White in racist countries like Australia and the UK. The issue of who should be selected to fill any job is down to nothing more than whom is the best person to do so. Racist Whites always assume it can only be Whites that are best in all and any circumstances. The sheer ignominy of a White person having to compete with someone less White than himself is enough to crush his ethnocentric ego. Only a morbidly skin obsessed White racist could ever possibly imagine that being operated on by second rate British doctor would be preferable to being operated upon by a first rate foreigner. It is to be hoped that Whites with this attitude will die on the operating table, as soon as possible under the scalpels of members of their own benighted ethnicity. The second paragraph simply isn't true – why would any government spend money training an expensive doctor and then not use the skills and abilities so created? Racists will believe anything that allows them to attack those not blessed with their sacred skin coloration. The basic issue here is that racists can no longer appeal to patriotism, nationalism and chauvinism as a source of identity, since the nation state is in decline both as a concept and as a practice. They have no way of knowing whom they are without being able to use their skin colour to pretend it makes them superior to others. Without this, they will have to actually engage in adult achievements rather than attack those foreigners having the guts to do same – what Whites are not prepared to do. After all, if Whites seriously wish employment, then they must – like everyone else in the world – be prepared to look overseas. Racism is simply a tariff on employment designed to ensure Whites remain employed, regardless of ability, and to ensure they don't ever face the fact that they're just as good as anyone else – not better. Without racism, Whites wouldn't survive in the wild since racism offers them no survival skills (only the delusion of superiority) that could ever ensure they stayed alive when surrounded by those more streetwise than themselves. It's an emotional crutch for those who can't stand on their own two feet as much as calls for duties on cheap imported goods are attempts to subsidise failing industries that can’t compete. Ethnic Whites are members of a failing race peopling a failed political economy that has never really gotten over the loss of its many Empires, so grieves for their respective return.

Canada Pulls out of UN Anti-Racism Conference

A classic example of White Racism in that brown skinned countries are required to renounce racism before a debate on racism can begin, while white skinned countries are not. It's common for Whites to claim that Blacks should engage in debates with White Racists in order to defeat Their arguments, but when the shoe is on the other foot, Whites – themselves - lack the courage to practice what They preach. 'Last week, Bernier apologised to Israel after his ministry published an internal document that included Israel and United States in a list of countries were prisoners risk torture. He ordered the mistaken entry to be edited out.' This is typical of White Racism in its attempt to deny that both Israel and the US are supporters of torture, when they manifestly are. Typically, Whites want to control the agenda of any meeting where Their racism is being discussed in order to control those dark-skinned humans they claim superiority over. This is why all such discussions with Whites are doomed to failure because They can't resist being racist in the very context of a discussion of racism. Because racism provides Whites with manifest advantages, this will remain so until there are no more Whites on the Earth or They choose to freely renounce racism. There's also the claim that Cuba, Iran and Libya are racist countries because their representatives are. This is, in itself, racist. The Durban conference is, in reality, better off without those who refuse to address their own racism; preferring instead to project and to displace it onto others they label as inferior.