Sunday, 30 July 2017

Lunatics

(2017)

Lunatics Taking Over the Asylum

Trashy Cultures Produce Trashy People

The rule of law is better than the rule of any individual.

Image of Aristotle Aristotle (384322 BCE), Greek Philosopher. Politics, Book 3, chapter 3, section 16 (350 BCE).

On Friday, 31 March 2017 15:05, I approached PC05 in Tunbridge Wells’ Library. A White male saw me do so then, knowingly and intentionally, stepped right in front of me and then unplugged it to insert his mobile phone charger; seating himself at the chair in front of it to deliberately block my passage.

His companion (another White male) trying to use PC06 noted my presence and I was forced to remove the charger and re‑insert the PC plug into its socket. I then asked this man to move and relinquish the seat for PC05.

He became sullen and childish and his standing companion demanded I should remain polite when dealing with racial‑harassment – something I never do, since racist micro‑aggressions:

  1. Always calls forth my generalised contempt for Caucasians;
  2. put me under no obligation to treat racists as equals; &,
  3. are based upon the White supremacy that can get me killed (that I am willing to kill to protect myself from).

The standing gentleman wisely chose to de‑escalate a situation, which I never initiated (that he realised could so easily have turned physically‑violent, since I am never going to tolerate any racist nonsense); by getting his companion to relinquish the seat he was occupying – thereby allowing me to go about my lawful business in a lawful manner. His wisdom, however, did not extend to not causing such attention‑seeking scenes in the first place, nor to realising that rights works both ways and a violation of one by another will lead to an equal violation by the other to the one.

PC05 clearly indicated that it had been booked, yet the seated gentleman initially‑refused to relinquish the chair for PC05 and, in a childish fit of pique, pushed it across the room so that it hit the back of the chair of a woman sitting at (I think) PC02. She remonstrated with him briefly about this.

I somehow doubt that if I went to their homes and ate their food and watched their tvs (claiming private property was public property, in the process), that their response to this would be any less aggressive than mine to their claim to personally own public property by believing they can disable PCs and use their electrical sockets to charge their phones.

Scared at the thought of a well‑built Black man physically‑attacking them, they both then tried to blame the intended victim of their White supremacist attitudes by complaining of the fact they now found they could not sit next to me on PC06 because of the atmosphere of violence (which they, themselves, irresponsibly created). They quickly left, muttering insults such as Fucking prick and Twat.

Needless to say, neither male complained to library staff about my behaviour, since they both knew they were in the wrong; making it obvious how discourteous Whites will be in order to defend their imaginary White supremacist rights; while expecting Black people to be remain polite no matter what. (Of course, I never complained to library staff since the last time I did [7/1/2016], I was accused of being racist and subsequently banned from all Kent libraries for six months – accused of the non‑existent Protest Psychosis.) No apology was offered me, by either – hardly a surprise from people who have about as much respect for others as they do for themselves.

As usual with White males, necessarily‑aggressive and intimidating behaviour from Black males ‑ even when outnumbered (as here) ‑ is enough to cool their racist ardour, as well as to self‑fulfillingly convince them that Black people are so dangerous to White people that White supremacy appears justified.


The world is too dangerous to live in – not because of the people who do evil, but because of the people who sit and let it happen.

Lex Talionis

My physical size was mentioned by them as somehow a threat despite this not obviously being the case when they decided to obstruct me. Why fear me for my size after the incident they initiated rather than before it, since my size did not change at any time during my time in the library?

In the twisted world of White people, People Of Colour (POC) using their physical size against White supremacists is bad; while White supremacists using their racism against POC is somehow OK. Somehow, Whites think it unfair that they were born smaller than those they hate and fear, so are stupid enough to antagonise those bigger than themselves; creating conflicts they are too physically weak to fight!

This absurd White terror is a tacit confession of a peculiar White psychological weakness. Given that there were two of them and only one of me, my size should never have been a problem for them; unless they were suggesting that Whites can only overpower Blacks at a higher ratio than two‑to‑one, despite their master race sympathies. Is White people’s fear of POC so great that, even when the odds are in their favour, Whites back down? Equal‑opportunities’ racists believe Black people should handicap themselves to make White supremacy easier to practice: That Blacks actually fighting back is somehow fundamentally‑unfair to White people!

Respectability politics

This was also a rather obvious example of the White desire that POC always be polite to them no matter the provocation and no matter the fact that politesse is a two‑way street. And no matter the fact that despite higher standards of public behaviour among Blacks, Whites will still be racist, because appeasing White societal values does not promote respect, but is instead a fear‑fuelled defence mechanism of minority communities; resulting in the challenge for POC of negotiating everyday social spaces; potentially negatively‑impacting their mental health since White supremacy is not a reaction to unethical Black behaviour (which can be changed) but to skin colour (which cannot); meaning White acceptance can only come from Black self‑denial.

It takes huge amounts of White chutzpah to be abusive and then to claim that it is, in fact, the abuser whom is being abused (like a murdering US policeman claiming a fleeing Black male made him fear for his life). However, it is an infallible rule of retribution that its instrument be forged not by the offended, but by the offenders – themselves – in their desperate bid to rationalise their problem‑cuasing behaviour. The offers POC no incentive to behave as submissively as Whites would like.

Despite living every day with institutionalised racism, if POC express any emotion while talking about it, they are told they are being angry – in a desperate White attempt to shut down the speaker and invalidate any arguments made by claiming that they are overly‑sensitive or being too emotional; Whites playing the race card which only they can benefit from.

Or worse, POC are told that they are being racist, without explaining how the victim can be the victimiser or the rapee the rapist. Moreover, no explanation is ever offered as to why people who live with the constant fear of themselves, their friends, their families, their entire ethnic group being wiped‑out on a whim should not be angry. Must women being raped be polite to their assailants?

If I allow anyone to define my rights without my consent, then I, effectively, give them the right to do as they wish with me – even to the point of deciding to end my life whenever they see fit.

Regarding White supremacy – marginalisation, ostracism & exclusion – it is not up to Whites to decide how upset POC should be. If Whites have a right to express their true feelings, then so do POC – even, and especially, when those expressions frighten Whites: There can be no such thing as being too loud or too angry when it comes to standing up for the value of one’s life. (After all, no‑one is required to earn the human rights they were born with by doing as Whites tell them.)

This must be how Rosa Parks must have felt when she sat in omnibus seats reserved for White people – the only problem here, of course, being that there is no Jim Crow in the UK. Yet there is also no self‑respectful concern here for how POC feel about such behaviour from such high‑handed Whites, along with the belief that I have no right to be annoyed about it. Obviously, I am not allowed to protest at this arrogant display of White privilege.

Clearly, White people value their hurt feelings more highly than the lives of POC: These must be protected at all costs, lest a single White person be shown to be complicit in a racist system designed to adversely affect millions whose lives Whites simply do not care about. White supremacists pretend they do not understand why their racism makes POC angry; proving that they are as sub‑human as they claim POC are. If White people do not wish to see Black anger, it is simple: Stop provoking it.

Morality

There is clearly here an inability to distinguish right from wrong and to indulge in immature fantasies of self‑righteous empowerment over others. It has always been obvious to me that White hypocrisy is deeply‑rooted in the Caucasian voodoo of White supremacy. Whites do not wish to understand that social life, which follows upon the natural sociality of human beings, implicates the individual in a web of moral obligations, commitments & duties to be fulfilled in pursuit of the common good; things superfluous by Whites, yet central to good moral character.

This kind of manic behaviour in the UK is only ever manifested regularly by White people, in their unsubstantiated belief that they – alone – own public space. Why do I not, apparently, possess a right to be offended by any attempt to violate my rights with an imaginary right to engage in such a violation?

White Whine

They were both annoyed that their claims of White supremacy did not make me fear them – why would they? No‑one has ever met a superior White man. This is the usual attempt by Whites to project the racially‑hostile atmosphere they single‑handedly create on to POC in a desperate bid to blame POC for White supremacy: A kind of malignant narcissism.

Upset and resentful because I have first‑refusal over a PC I had booked and was willing to fight them over their belief that the booking system does not apply to me and could be so easily‑invalidated by them.

There is something absurdly peculiar in fear‑fuelled White self‑pity in that it is also, simultaneously, self‑aggrandising. And is what can happen if they indulge their fantasies of the world owing them a living: A Moral hazard. It is the belief that treating others well is somehow a psychic loss to the person behaving well. If such people cannot grasp the basic rules of social conduct, then they should only be allowed out on the shortest of leashes.

Legal Rights

No‑one can tell me why POC have to put up with this nonsense, especially as my inevitably‑angry response is a scary learning‑curve for those who mistakenly‑assume I believe the world owes them a living. It also ensures that all those Whites who witness my behaviour are less likely to emulate racist behaviours both to me, my friends, my family and, indeed, my entire ethnic group – all in the interests of ethnic self‑defence.

Social existence is a rule‑governed, game‑playing ritual. But for the sad person, rules are bent and loopholes exploited; while engaging in social performances that obey common expectations, yet are designed to defy others and, thereby, gain unearned respect: All to avoid their taking personal responsibility for the resolution of their personal problems. I am not a do‑gooder and care nothing for the self‑inflicted problems of the mentally‑ill. If I can toughen‑up regarding existential problems, then so can they. Living in a racist culture like White culture, I have had to toughen‑up since my very life depends upon doing so.

Filtering Customers

It is hardly surprising that few POC use the Library Service in Kent, given the open hostility of both its staff and customers to their very presence. This, despite the fact that there is an ongoing decline in the Britain’s public libraries that is partly attributable to their not wanting any POC to be customers; thereby reducing hastening the decline.

Fear & Loathing

My approach is simple. I employ the Golden Rule (only do unto others what you would wish done to you). When others do not follow this rule, I am then able to use the norm of reciprocity; meaning I can do unto them what they have done to me. It is always important to recognise that the behaviours associated with anger are designed to warn aggressors to stop their threatening behaviour, which is why modern psychologists view anger as a primary, natural and mature emotion, experienced by virtually all humans – and as something that has functional survival value.

Given the trashy people White culture regularly produces, and the fact that no‑one I know really has the time for their childishness, POC clearly need to be appropriately‑aggressive, suitably‑threatening and personally‑intimidating to Whites in order to enforce their rights, since POC are not responsible for the feelings of White supremacists. This not only saves time and resources going to court, but helps enforce rights I actually do possess to stop Whites from trying to enforce rights they do not. I have no choice but to be an anti‑racist at all times, since my life is at stake. If White fear is the only way forward, then that is all fine by me, since this will involve very little work on my part since Whites already fear POC – as the above example clearly reveals.











Postscript: Coincidentally, I was recently reading an article on 249-665-1-PB.pdfWhite fragility, which helps explain some of the underlying psychological‑processes at work:

  1. Because Whites think they can claim unfair treatment when their racially‑entitled position is challenged by People of colour POC, Whites are able to demand that more social resources (eg, time & attention) be channelled in their direction to help them cope with the alleged mistreatment: If privilege is defined as a legitimisation of one’s entitlement to resources, it can also be defined as permission to escape or avoid any challenges to this entitlement (Vodde [2001], page 3); &,
  2. by suggesting POC are abusing White people in expecting equality, Whites tap into the classic discourse of People of Colour (POC) as dangerous‑because‑inherently‑violent; perverting the actual direction of danger existing between Whites and others. The history of brutal, extensive, institutionalised and ongoing violence perpetrated by Whites against POC becomes profoundly‑trivialised when Whites claim they are under attack in the unusual situation of merely talking with POC; illustrating how fragile and ill‑equipped White people are to confront the racial tensions they create – and their subsequent, evasive projection of their maladjustment onto POC (Morrison, 1992).
Post a Comment

About Us:

My photo

Frank TALKER - Truth-Teller