Sunday 24 February 2008

What will it take to end Child Poverty?

The problem here is that the reason for pretending to want to alleviate poverty is to increase the tax take, rather than altruism, and to cut social welfare costs. This is the hypocrisy caused by the fact that the welfare state has failed, and that there is to be no simple political admission of this for fear of losing votes from supporters. This is also an attempt to blackmail the affluent and the wealthy into paying the poor an increased proportion of their income in order to avoid their having to pay more in future, if they don't, from ever increasing social costs such as crime, visible poverty and even, perhaps, social revolution. However, these proposals never refer to the fact that most poor choose to be poor precisely because they can always rely on social engineers (ie, charitable mugs) to pay their bills for them. Charities and the poor are mutually corrupt because they're mutually dependent: The poor exploit charity to avoid work; the charitable exploit the poor to evade their own lovelessness. This is the true reason the poor have reduced employment prospects, not the unwillingness of governments to stump up the cash to keep the poor alive & kicking. No matter how much money you give to the poor, they will always want more, since such ethical corruption is always a bottomless pit into which the guilty (those who claim the poor are disadvantaged; ie, not as good as us, really) are always tempted to drop finite resources. You can always get a pint out of a quart pot, after all. The solution is to abolish social welfare altogether. The only way to empower others is to stop calling them disempowered by claiming they need your help because they're inferior. If true, then no attempt at empowerment can ever help anyone since that would be like claiming that a one legged man could grow a second leg and become an Olympic athlete. Such has never happened and never will. The idea that we could ever live in a share and share alike culture is naïve since it's obvious that we live in a dog eat dog; every man for himself one. Such a political change would require such a fundamental realignment of people's attitude to life that they would have to become the leopards that changed their spots. Can anyone suggest a historical epoch in which such a change has ever happened? No, of course not! The only way to end child poverty is to kill all the poor children, to take those poor children into care as a punishment for their parents not working hard to achieve productive goals or to sterilise the poor to reduce their birth-rates.

Saturday 23 February 2008

Recycled Communism & Nazism

(2008)

Here is the essence of White Culture laid bare with great brevity. Notice that Whites have always vigorously championed all of these political phenomena in Their instinctive desire to recreate the world in Their own image. Problem is that to do this, first the majority of the world's population must be defined as inferior so that they can be removed to make way for a world largely run by and for Whites; largely comprised of Whites.

Sunday 10 February 2008

You need friends in high places

Hereward: '…[I]n future regional public health bodies will (Sic) be told that international medical graduates shoul (Sic) be eligible for posts only if there was (Sic) no suitable graduate (Sic) from Britain.' 'Falling educational standards [in England] and a politically correct policy of employing third world people over local graduates.' The first paragraph above is racist nonsense by Whites that wish to maintain the unearned privileges of being White in racist countries like Australia and the UK. The issue of who should be selected to fill any job is down to nothing more than whom is the best person to do so. Racist Whites always assume it can only be Whites that are best in all and any circumstances. The sheer ignominy of a White person having to compete with someone less White than himself is enough to crush his ethnocentric ego. Only a morbidly skin obsessed White racist could ever possibly imagine that being operated on by second rate British doctor would be preferable to being operated upon by a first rate foreigner. It is to be hoped that Whites with this attitude will die on the operating table, as soon as possible under the scalpels of members of their own benighted ethnicity. The second paragraph simply isn't true – why would any government spend money training an expensive doctor and then not use the skills and abilities so created? Racists will believe anything that allows them to attack those not blessed with their sacred skin coloration. The basic issue here is that racists can no longer appeal to patriotism, nationalism and chauvinism as a source of identity, since the nation state is in decline both as a concept and as a practice. They have no way of knowing whom they are without being able to use their skin colour to pretend it makes them superior to others. Without this, they will have to actually engage in adult achievements rather than attack those foreigners having the guts to do same – what Whites are not prepared to do. After all, if Whites seriously wish employment, then they must – like everyone else in the world – be prepared to look overseas. Racism is simply a tariff on employment designed to ensure Whites remain employed, regardless of ability, and to ensure they don't ever face the fact that they're just as good as anyone else – not better. Without racism, Whites wouldn't survive in the wild since racism offers them no survival skills (only the delusion of superiority) that could ever ensure they stayed alive when surrounded by those more streetwise than themselves. It's an emotional crutch for those who can't stand on their own two feet as much as calls for duties on cheap imported goods are attempts to subsidise failing industries that can’t compete. Ethnic Whites are members of a failing race peopling a failed political economy that has never really gotten over the loss of its many Empires, so grieves for their respective return.