Tuesday, 29 July 2008

Acute Mental Health Wards are Failing Patients

The real problem here of course is that Blacks lack the sense of neighbourhood identity and personal drive to fund their own community services. They prefer, instead, to go cap in hand to Whites who are not only already racist, but who will continue to believe White racism is justified precisely because Blacks behave in this childlike manner.

Friday, 25 July 2008

Symposium on DNA Database


'Open to the general public this meeting will look at why 57% of all innocent DNA in London is from black people and discuss (Sic) community leaders are concerns that the National DNA Criminal Database is criminalising (Sic) a community by stealth'. The answer to this question is obvious: Whites are racist and want to place Blacks under their thumb in a vain effort to stave off the inevitable Black backlash against that very racism. This means that the DNA database is not criminalizing Blacks by stealth – White Racism has already done so – this Database is merely an extension of that process. Thus, removing innocent Black people from this national database would defeat its racist purpose and is not, therefore, going to happen. It is a crime prevention measure not a crime curative measure – it seeks to shut the stable door BEFORE the horse has bolted not AFTER. And this can only be achieved by criminalizing Blacks as scapegoats for the failings and the inadequacies of White culture; particularly those concerned with (non existent) crime reduction. It should always be borne in mind that Whites never consider Blacks to be innocent of anything since Blackness is obviously the White Christian God's punishment for sins committed in a past life – at least according to Ham. Using the word "innocent" here suggests Whites judge Blacks by the actions they engage in - as well as those they don't. Whites don't do this. They judge Blacks by their skin colour – it's really that simple. 'Just being on that database suggests that you are involved in criminal activity. This goes against the original purpose of the database, which was to keep records of convicted criminals . (Sic) Something needs to be done as the Government may change the rules on how this technology (Sic) used which may go against us in the future', Bishop Wayne Malcolm Christian Life City Chair in Hackney East London. Needless to say, the good bishop has his head up his anus. The "original purpose" of the database was never revealed to the public otherwise there would have been an outcry at the time. Now that it has been created it is too late to talk about its original purpose: A complete listing of the entire population – regardless of criminal behaviour. Now nothing can be done to prevent this and this database will certainly be used against Blacks – as scapegoats - "in the future" whenever Whites commit more crimes or whenever the White economy goes belly up as it regularly does. 'If you want the BME communities to trust the police and the establishment then they must be open and transparent… It undermines community cohesion and a lot of good work that has been done,' Pastor Desmond Hall, Christian Together in Brent. Another fool who believes Blacks could ever trust a racist police service policing an endemically racist country. One might as well say that there would come a time when parents could ever trust paedophiles. By the way, there's no such thing as "community cohesion" and one would dearly wish to know what "good work" Pastor Hall thinks "has been done". By whom? When? 'It is a travesty that we have to lobby our government and lawmakers to take action to protect the innocent and some of the most vulnerable groups in society. - Olu Alake, president, 100 Black Men of London.' Whites created "[M]ost vulnerable groups in society" for them to have a pool of scapegoats – in perpetuity. This is why Whites are not keen on helping the poor out of poverty; preferring, instead, to condition them to it via a welfare system designed to institutionalise the condition. Moreover, governments are not concerned with the protection of the innocent but with the apportionment of blame. No matter what folly governments involve themselves in, they never take the blame for any mistakes that they make. Innocence itself is no protection against the predatory nature of Whites – you must expose their racism at every turn to exploit the race guilt the more fully for the benefit of Blacks. 'The recent massive expansion of the DNA database is not helping to solve more crimes, but rather threatening the rights o (Sic) those who have been arrested and have their DNA on the database indefinitely.' It was never designed to do the former – only to give the impression that it could. The same is true of identity cards, which are designed to allow the police to harass Blacks. The threat here is designed to show Blacks that, as far as Whites are concerned, Blacks have less human rights than Whites - and Blacks had better get used to it. Ultimately, there is no argument here to refute the usual White canard that if you have nothing to hide, and are as innocent as you say you are, then what's the problem? The problem, of course, is Whites using skin colour as a metric of character – as they have always done.

Wednesday, 23 July 2008

Mayor's Report: Lee Jasper Responds

Like so many Blacks who believe Whites can change, Lee Jasper is dangerously naïve and politically unsophisticated. For Jasper to claim that his reputation has been 'badly damaged' is purest whining of the basest kind. Only among Whites can a reputation be damaged since Whites assume all Blacks genetically corrupt to begin with such that Blacks can never actually possess a good reputation – no matter how hard they try. Therefore, the reputation of any Black can never be damaged among Whites since a Black with a good reputation cannot possibly exist inside the racist mindset of Whites. Lee Jasper needs to seriously consider what his constituency really is since such damage to his reputation can only occur among Blacks. (Incidentally, 'false allegations' is a semantic solecism since allegations can only ever be true, otherwise they would not exist in the first place! It is only the lack of evidential support that can make them false, not the allegations themselves.) Jasper claims that when Whites talk about 'waste', they're really talking about Black organisational funding. This is more whining. Blacks need to finance their own development from their own hard work & effort and stop relying on Whites, as such, and White Race guilt to help Blacks out. The latter merely contributes to a racist White backlash against anyone with the so called temerity to remind Whites how racist they are. Only by independence can Blacks learn to stand on their own two feet and stop feeding the White racist propaganda machine that says Blacks are incapable of separate development, on their own. Jasper goes on to claim that Whites seek to 'demonise' London's Blacks. Obviously, however, they do not seek to do this since they have already done so – at least in their own minds – for the past seven centuries. In reality, Whites seek to exploit the already existing White view that Blacks are a demonic threat to the alleged superiority of White culture. Lee Jasper here implies that Whites are morally empty, easily led fools when, in addition, they are merely already replete with easily exploitable race hatred. You cannot 'demonise' anyone who's already seen as demonic. Despite the complete absence of evidence of fraud on Lee Jasper's part, he cannot be nearly so ingenuous as he implies he is since he must know full well that Whites believe that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The racist smoke Whites create by the very activity they call racism is precisely designed to allow Whites to falsely claim: "There's no smoke without fire". Bizarrely and stupidly, Jasper believes Whites should be honest about their racism! Clearly, this will be no more the case than a force of terrorists giving the West prior warning of a terrorist outrage! To openly admit to being racist would undermine the very racism Whites seek to perpetrate on their betters. Because Whites need the feelings of superiority that come with being racist it's hardly likely they are going to make it obvious that they are using underhand methods to achieve political advantage. Especially when Whites make such a play of their self willed belief in their own ability to engage in "fair play". The truth is that Whites lack the intellectual development and the morality to justify their racism, which is precisely why they'll be as covert about it as possible. Lee Jasper simply wants a level playing field of racist practice which, since racism is decidedly inegalitarian, is a ridiculous admission of his own inability to spot White Racism when he's confronted with it. In which case, what kind of Race Advisor can such a man really be when he so profoundly misidentifies the real issues at hand.

About Us:

My photo

Frank TALKER - Truth-Teller