Tuesday, 28 October 2008

Jihadi Child Porn
(2008)

Depraved World of Jihadi Child Porn

The usual, extremist race hatred from Whites. There's no such thing as 'Jihadi child porn' – only terrorists who happen to use porn sites for communication purposes. The idea of a sexual link is unproven and remains just a correlative, political one – not a sexual, causative linkage. 'Besides their well-known penchant for anti-Semitism, misogyny and nihilistic violence, Muslim extremists...' This could also just as easily be said of Roman Catholics so no real point is being made about the nature of terrorism. Odd, given that this is an article supposedly about terrorists, but this is really a piece about the racial rage of its author. This writer refers to terrorism as a 'deviant' behavior when it is really no more than the result White Christians can expect when crusading against Muslims. To try to pathologise freedom fighting, in this way, proves that name calling is the only weapon this writer has in his armory. This comes from his ultimate realization that terrorists usually get what they want because they are difficult to root out of their home bases and impossible to separate from the terrorism inflicted upon them by Western Whites. The idea that defaming your enemies will 'help [Western] security agencies understand the terrorist mindset and prevent future attacks' is the worst kind of wishful thinking and proves the failure to deal with the threat either curatively or – better still – preventively. In truth, there is no way to cure terrorism, once it has arisen; it can only be prevented in the future by not interfering in the political situations of others. 'Police say they are already noticing a similarity in methods Muslim terrorists and pedophiles use in manipulating and grooming young people for their corrupt purposes'. Again, the words 'corrupt' and 'deviant' are used to conflate two separate activities as if they were the same thing; while simultaneously admitting that there is a similarity of technique, not a similarity of aim. 'When arrested, Abdelkader Ayachine... possessed almost 40,000 child pornographic movies and images, a number far exceeding any need for encoded communications'. This author does not proffer what he considers the right number of movies and images needed for 'encoded communication'; thereby invalidating his point. The problem here is that no objective definition of child porn is used in this article because the age of majority varies from state to state so that no such definition can be arrived at. Therefore, this piece merely attacks those cultures that allow marriages at an age that would be deemed far too young in the West. This is not objective reporting but an attempt to racialistically claim that Western culture is superior because of its sexual mores. Nevertheless, no objective evidence for this is ever offered. Moreover, this writer claims the existence of a 'demonized female form', yet this is also true in ostensibly Christian countries where female nakedness arouses many men to anger rather than to desire. And is covered to protect women from attack from the angry ones - as is done in Muslim countries. And he perpetuates his ignorance by claiming that women are 'forced' to wear' 'body-encompassing clothing', even though this is only true of a minority of Muslim countries. Oddly, he then goes on to say that '[i]n such a gender segregated environment, homosexual behavior develops, especially towards boys'. Of course, a Westerner raised on the Western Christian tradition would inevitably assume such a thing since it is also true, for example of celibate Western priests and monks. Here the writer reveals his homophobia when it claims that homosexuality is de facto 'sexploitation' of boys. Criticizing pederasty in Afghanistan as an 'accepted social norm' means he believes that it should not be. But, where does he get the right to make such a claim about the behavior of others in countries not his own? The author never explains. 'Sexual exploitation of boys in Muslim countries also has a long history'. So claims this author, but he offers scant evidence for this religious defamation. For this author, homosexuality is a 'grotesque phenomenon', but why is homosex between consenting partners 'grotesque'? He claims the Koran itself promises to put 'pre-pubescent boys at the service of Jihadi martyrs not interested in the female virgins awaiting them in paradise' - the usual subjectivist interpretation of texts serving the defamer's purpose. He does not show that such boys will be exploited for sexual purposes nor that the 'female virgins' are also 'pre pubescent'. Worst of all, this writer claims that Islamic culture is a de facto breeding ground for sexual deviance that inevitably leads to terrorist atrocities. Again, the same could easily be said of Roman Catholics and their fear of the vagina and all its works. Moreover, of the Catholics' millennia long tendency to support imperialist racism abroad – to express their 'sexual rage', since there was much sexual abuse in the days of the White empires of Europe. 'Such sexually traumatized Muslim boys are predisposed to become involved in terrorism as a way of expressing their sexual rage' and yet we find no numbers quoted. Is this all Muslim men – as implied? Most? Or a minority? The conclusion: 'A way of finding who the extremists and terrorists are is to go through the child porn sites'. The basic fact is that because terrorists use child porn to further their ends does not automatically make them pedophiles. That kind of correlation would be like pretending that because some terrorists eat halal that one merely has to keep halal meat shops under surveillance to catch them. As with all attempts at demonizing a race or a religion, there is a lack of causative evidence here of the empirical kind.


Article copyright © 2008 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved. Frank TALKER is also the author of Sweaty Socks: A Treatise on the Inevitability of Toe Jam in Hot Weather (East Cheam Press: Groper Books, 1997) and is University of Bullshit Professor Emeritus of Madeupology.
Post a Comment

About Us:

My photo

Frank TALKER - Truth-Teller